PART THREE : by L. WAYNE HICKS
Part One Here

Q: Who were you trying to reach?

A: The young. The young audience.

Q: Did you have a particular age in mind?

A: Yeah, particularly anywhere from 3 to 8 years of age. Males left us earlier than females as they grew. That’s just the nature of our culture. Males between 8 and 9 were drawn to action programming and the like. Young females would very often stay with the show until 10 or 11 years of age. That was an indication more of the way we in this culture approach males and females differently. And we successfully reached that audience. The only surprise to us really from the beginning was the number of adults that we reached. About a third of our audience was adults. That of course I always interpreted as being positive because we felt these were parents experiencing the program with their children. Perhaps it was providing some guidance to them in providing nurturing skills and ideas that would be useful to them in nurturing their young people. "Sesame Street," on the other hand, in the beginning did not reach that audience at all. They were reaching older kids because they were dealing in older material, which they did realize and now the program’s entirely different. Now it does deal very much with the emotional development of the child and they’re much more on target than they were in the very beginning.

Q: Going into your show originally, were you focusing on just entertainment or did you have the educational component in mind already?

A: I often made the point that there is no difference in my mind between education and entertainment. That the stuff of entertainment is education. That material is fascinating and it ought to be the basis for entertainment, and that’s really what it was. We didn’t want anybody, a child, looking at the show to say oh he’s trying to teach me this. They’re trying to demonstrate that. We would have failed if that occurred.
What’s more important: entertainment or education? I say both. There isn’t a line there as far as I’m concerned. There is no distinction between entertainment and education. I read "John Adams," David McCullough’s book, and to me it’s like reading a great novel. It’s wonderful. Because that’s the kind of stuff that really fascinates me. And it should be fascinating for most of our young people. We should approach education that way. The best teacher in the world, whether it be a kindergarten teacher or a college professor, is one who entertains, one who engages the mind of the student. You’ve got to entertain. This is why our system is failing, because we don’t have good teachers who understand this, who understand how to reach a child.

Q: You had experience as an entertainer, working on the "Howdy Doody Show," but how comfortable were you with the educational component? Did you rely on your own experiences as a parent or did you have to bring in experts to say this is what you should do to teach the kids about this or that?

A: Well, we did, we always had consultants. We had people from the Harvest Mann Lincoln Institute or the Columbia Teacher’s College, places like that, who were on staff and met with our writers and our producers and others regularly and taught us. For those of us doing the program, it was kind of a workshop on the education of young people. But no, it didn’t happen overnight. A lot of us did rely. We were young. We were parents and we knew what parents were facing in raising children. We knew the questions they were asking because we were asking the same questions and we were just simply try to answer them. Yes, we did consult with people who were experts. On the other hand, depending on the expert -- some of them understood us tremendously; others didn’t know what their function was. We had some experts write Bunny Rabbit material for us and submit it and it was dreadful. It was really dreadful. We had to say, "We don’t need the material. Leave that to us. You just tell us what the needs of the child are, what’s important in the life of a typical 4-year-old, what’s typical in the life of an atypical 4-year-old, a child who has this problem or that problem or doesn’t have the kind of home setting that would be ideal in raising a child. Give us an education in all of those things, hey, and we’ll take care of Bunny Rabbit and Mr. Moose and all that." That’s pretty much the way it worked out. It was a very collegial effort and it turned out well.

Q: I can’t recall what I specifically learned from watching your show. It’s been too many years.

A: You didn’t know it then. We didn’t want you to know it.

Q: I look back at the show and I think about Tom Terrific and ping pong balls and Dancing Bear and I have this sense of well-being.

A: That latter is probably the most important thing you could say. However we got there, that’s where we were going. Giving you that sense of well-being, giving you that confidence, that good feeling that you were able to do anything, that you were able to accomplish some things. That you were able to undertake something that maybe other people would tell you you couldn’t do. That was important. That was where we were going. And how we got there really wasn’t important. Whether it was the culmination of a circuitous plot by Mr. Moose and Bunny Rabbit which ended with ping pong balls on my head, it didn’t matter how we got there.
What really did matter was that we got there and we were able to give you and others a confidence in life. Just feeling good about yourself. That’s enormously important, just feeling good. Most kids today lack that confidence. They’re challenged so. They’re challenged by the people who shouldn’t challenge them, their own parents very often, and they’re criticized constantly, not encouraged. Most parents have never heard about positive discipline. They hear about beat the devil out of the kid and you’ll achieve your purpose. This is the way you destroy a child. And most parents don’t know that. Most parents don’t realize we’re all very much the same as human beings. We need love. We need encouragement. We need positive reinforcement on a constant and daily basis. And that’s what we were for an hour in the morning: positive reinforcement.

Q: I have to ask you. Did you anger some writer who wanted to drop ping pong balls on your head?

A: It’s kind of like the Dancing Bear story. It was nothing. It was just an idea. We wanted to give a device to Mr. Moose of some kind. A writer came up with this notion. The only difference was when I looked at the script I said, "Oh, no" because he had called for golf balls to drop on my head. I said, "I’m not going to last very long if you’re going to drop golf balls on my head." Somebody said, "How about ping pong balls? They’re not weighty and you’ll be able to take that." I said Fine. If it’s set up properly, it’s a funny concept. Mr. Moose enjoyed it so thoroughly; as did every child and ever parent at home enjoy it. They were laughing with the Moose. They weren’t really laughing at me. I liked being in that position, of being outwitted by Bunny Rabbit and Mr. Moose because there’s a vulnerability to us as adults. We’re not perfect, and it’s important for a child to understand a parent is not perfect. That it is possible to be smarter than a parent once in a while.

Q: Was it written that way, that Mr. Moose and Bunny Rabbit would sort of be your children on the show and you’d be the parent?

A: Yeah. Well, they weren’t my children but they certainly were surrogates for children and they were mischievous. They had these really way-out ideas that any child would find wonderful. They conduct themselves that way. That was fine. That was very appropriate behavior for them. On the other hand, there was always a pulling back if they ever moved too far in that direction. It would never become unkind without our pointing out that you don’t do things that are unkind.

Q: How many ping pong balls do you think were dropped on your head during the course of the show?

A: Uh, 952,483. How do I know? (laughs) I had one child convinced once that we spent every day counting them and that we had that tabulated perfectly to the very last one over all those years and he believed it. But I won’t do that to you.

1981 episode of Captain Kangaroo

Q: Did the character of the Captain change much of the years?

A: Yeah. When we first went on the air he was kind of a Down East character with a little bit of Down East accent. I think we lost that in about three weeks. It was me. It grew into me. It just evolves that you become more yourself and that’s really it. The Captain is pretty much me. And that’s fine.

Q: And you went from having to whitening your hair to having white hair.

A: That’s for sure. Hey, I have less hair than the Captain did. (laughs) If I were to do it today, I’d still wear a wig. But I never want to do that again. I’d love to go back.

Q: The attempt to bring it back with a different actor didn’t work.

A: Oh, God no. Absolutely not. I was not involved with that at all. I offered my services as a consultant but they didn’t want me. There’s a tremendous audacity in this business. Take a producer from Fox’s Saban, the people who did it, they don’t need anybody. They don’t need the original cast, they don’t need the writers, they don’t need the producers. "We know how to do a show. We did the Power Rangers." So I just walked away.

Q: So if someone were to put it on the air again, would you be willing to step back in the role of the Captain?

A: I really wouldn’t want to come back in costume as the Captain because it’s a lot of work. What I would be willing to do is the creation of new material and I would be very willing to do maybe an animated Captain that would be part of the show. That’s very possible. We could do some very nice material there, including the development of a lot of new characters. What can be done today with the technical advances that have occurred in the last decade are just tremendous. I think we could make a very presentable program. I don’t want to get involved in the production as the executive producer anymore. I’ve had that. But if other people wanted to do it, my services would be available to them and I think we could do a very good program.

Q: I wanted to ask you what you think different people brought to the show. What do you think "Lumpy" Brannum, who played Mr. Green Jeans, brought to Captain Kangaroo?

A: He was talking about the environment in 1955. Many adults didn’t know what environment in that context meant. This was early on. Nobody talked about the environment in those days, not certainly on a general program and certainly not one for children. But he had a reverence. That came from him. It wasn’t something that our writers said: "Now you’re going to have a reverence for life." He taught them that. He felt that way, very strongly. He was a protester when they were building dams on rivers that would destroy farms and property. He was for clean water. He was for clean air. He was for non-fossil fuels and production of energy and the like. His reverence for life was there. It was for the growing things, the vegetables and the plants he would literally bring from his farm in Pennsylvania. It was obvious that Lumpy was at home with these things.

Q: What did Gus Allegretti bring to the show?

A: A genius is what he brought. Gus is a genius. He’s a great, great puppeteer. Bunny Rabbit and Mr. Moose and Dancing Bear. But he’s also got an incredible sense of humor. A wonderful, wonderful sense of humor. It sounds denigrating when you say "childlike." I don’t believe that at all. It’s a simple honest quirky sense of humor that worked very well when the Moose did something or said something to the staid Captain. It was just an absolutely wonderful addition. We got along very well from the very beginning. We were good friends. We weren’t close personally, actually. We’re very different human beings. He’s a very, very conservative guy, recognizing his background. His parents were immigrants to this country. He was very appreciative of America and all that America meant to his parents and to his family and to him. Every once in a while somebody in the studio would express an idea that was a little too liberal and Gus would tie into it. He made good arguments. He wasn’t just ranting and raving. He was quite an intellectual.

Q: What did you bring to "Captain Kangaroo"?

A: I don’t know. It’s hard to define what you do.

Q: How did you wind up working in television?

A: I had just come back from service, in the Marine Corps in World War II, at the end of World War II. I was in college and back at my old job at NBC. I worked as a page at NBC. They didn’t like it, but when I came back they had to give me my job back. That was the law. I was going to college at night and working during the day. I got involved with television, which didn’t exist then. There was New York, Philadelphia and Syracuse. That was the whole NBC network in the East in those days. There was hardly programming at all.
When "Howdy Doody" came along, we went on the air at 5 o’clock, which was unusual. Up until that time there was no programming. Then we went off at 6 o’clock and you watch a test pattern at 8 o’clock. Then you go to watch a film of skiing in Switzerland. People loved it. It was fascinating. Pictures through the air. My god, what miracles are in store for us. So I became very interested in it and I met Bob Smith.
Actually, I met one of Bob Smith’s writers. He was doing radio at the time. Early morning drive-time we call it now. It was all live. He played the piano, he sang some songs, had some little chatter in between. He played records. He did a feature twice a week called That Wonderful Year. He would take 1918 and he’d say, "In 1918 we first heard the song ‘Yes, We Have No Bananas’ and a suit of clothes cost $4.50 at Brooks Brothers and a loaf of bread could be had for 8 cents." Those were the things that the writer needed to supply him as he wrote the script for him. I was the one who supplied those details.
Then Bob did a children’s program for radio on Saturday morning and he invited me to come along to hand out prizes to the kids. It was kind of a quiz sort of format. And then "Howdy Doody" went on the air, it wasn’t "Howdy Doody," it was called "Puppet Playhouse." Bob was the master of ceremonies and Bob invited me to help, and I did.

NEXT: Part Four of Bob Keeshan's interview
Quitting Howdy Doody, Captain Kangaroo & more!
PLUS: Video from the last episode of Captain Kangaroo.

See Also:
Captain Kangaroo History
More on Captain Kangaroo
Captain Kangaroo Books & Toys

Rare Interview with Captain Kangaroo - Bob Keeshan
Bob Keeshan Interview 2 - Sesame Street & Mr. Rogers
Bob Keeshan Interview - part three
Bob Keeshan Interview - Howdy Doody & More

It is what it is!

Rare Interview with Captain Kangaroo - Bob Keeshan
Bob Keeshan Interview 2 - Sesame Street & Mr. Rogers
Bob Keeshan Interview - part three
Bob Keeshan Interview - Howdy Doody & More

Please consider a donation
so we can continue this work!

 

 

 

---

See Also:
Captain Kangaroo History
More on Captain Kangaroo
Captain Kangaroo Books & Toys

Rare Interview with
Captain Kangaroo Bob Keeshan

Captain Kangaroo Site

---

Kevin S. Butler writes: In his conversation with Mr. Hicks, Bob Keeshan claims that originally CBS TV wanted entertainer Jerry Colonna to host the network's daily kid's TV show. Originally CBS had three performers that they were auditioning - Merv Griffin, folk singer Frank Luther and Jerry Colonna.

These men were talented but with the exception of Griffin none of them had ever done a kid's show (Griffin had briefly served as the host of WTVJ TV 4, Miami's Lucky Duck Show. The heads of CBS TV decided to go with Mr. Keeshan's and Jack Miller's (Jack was Keeshan's first director) educational show concept.

Another recollection of Mr. Keeshan's states that he did a skit on The Carol Burnett Show where he tried to explain the premise of Captain Kangaroo to a skeptical network exec (played by Ms. Burnett). This skit was actually performed on the Cher show in the 1970's when Keeshan and the Hudson Brothers were guests on Cher's Sunday Night CBS variety program.

As to how Mr. Keeshan got the name for Captain Kangaroo, according to my interview with Jack Miller in October of 1989, he told me that the show was going to be set against the backdrop of a children's museum. Keeshan didn't like this setting, he feared that it would discourage children from watching the show. The setting was instead called the Treasure House and Keeshan's character was given the rank of "Captain of the Guards and Tour Guide."

Jack liked that idea but he felt that the character needed a last name to offset the formal rank. He told me, "In those days, Kevin, kids TV shows had titles that were silly - Howdy Doody, Pinky Lee, Rootie Kazootie - and we needed a a last name that would not be too ridiculous but still make the Captain's name meaningful and funny. So we went to the bar that night and after a few beers and a quick trip to the men's room, Bob wrote down a name on a slip of paper and put it into my jacket pocket and he said to me, 'Here it is.' And the name on the paper said 'Captain Kangaroo.'"

In regards to the years that Time For Fun and Tinker's Workshop were on the air on WJZ (WABC) TV 7 in NYC, Mr. Keeshan's knowledge of those two local series is inaccurate. Time For Fun was on from Monday, September 21, 1953 until Friday June 2, 1960 and that show was hosted by Keeshan's Corney The Clown, "Uncle Joe" Bova, Johnny Jellybean (Bill Britten) and by JJ Jellybean / Johnny Jellybean #2 Keith Hefner.

Tinker's Workshop was on Channel 7 from Monday, November 15, 1954 to Friday, August 22, 1958 and the character of Tinker The Toymaker / Tinker Tom the Toymaker was played first by Bob Keeshan then by Henry Burbig, Gene London and Dom Deluise.

---

TV on DVD / / Holiday Specials on DVD
TV Commercials on DVD
TV Shows on BLU-RAY

Dark Shadows

Lost Kid Shows / Movie Stars on TV / Saturday Morning Shows / Video Vault / Classic Christmas Specials / Fabulous Fifties / Unseen Scenes / Game Shows / Requested Forgotten TV Shows / The Super Sixties / The New * * Shows / 1980's Wrestling / TV Blog

Classic TV on the Internet!